12 October 2015

Özil proves once again that he's a complete waste of time, space, and money...

With another international break almost done and dusted, Gooners can assess with a discerning eye that performances of the Gunners playing for country rather than club, and, with that discerning eye screwed squarely to the sticking place, face the truth without passion or prejudice. That truth, sad though it may be to say, resounds loudly and clearly: Özil is, as the saying goes, nicking a living. His failures only come into sharper contrast when held up against the successes of other Gunners on international duty. Ramsey? He helped Wales qualify for its first major tournament final in 57 years. Alexis? He became Chile's third-highest scorer in history. Özil? Yawn. One assist in two matches. Against Ireland and Georgia, one might expect a higher rate of return on one's £42m investment.

When we signed this Turkish Talisman, this German Genius, we were told tales of his dazzling displays, perfectly-weighted passes, assists galore, tales to make the mind wander and the mouth drool. Instead, sadly, we've been made to feel like Tantalus, watching forlornly as Özil tempts us time and time again without ever really delivering. Against Ireland and Georgia, Özil delivered eleven key passes, more than the two countries could muster, combined (they managed nine, for those wondering). However, let's face cold, hard facts: a "key pass" is simply a failed assist. Özil, having registered just one assist from those eleven key passes, has a conversion rate of just 9%. That's woeful. Some might even call it wasteful.

Your correspondent, however, is not one of them. If Özil is everything he's been advertised to be, why then can he not succeed more often in deflecting his passes off of his teammates and into the back of the net? Why, against Georgia (just to seize excessively on one example), Özil tried and tried again to find just the perfect pass only to come up short each time. In fact, it comes as no small bit of irony that his strongest contribution to Germany's efforts came when he simply fell down in the area, as if he was saying, "I'm really no good at the passing, lads, you'd be best if you tried to score without me." Thomas Müller, perhaps proving my point, slotted home the penalty. Özil wasn't even in the picture, as if to underscore his the depths of his failure.

As we all know all too well, strikers are little more than overpaid cushions against which the truly skilled players can angle the ball in. Unfortunately, Özil has little if any sense of how to pull this off, as evinced by his shocking failures to do so against Georgia or Ireland. Players like Schürrle, Müller, and Reus have proven quite often that they are three-dimensional objects, perfectly serviceable when it comes to angling balls past keepers. Somehow, however, Özil can't be bothered to make this happen more than once in a blue moon. When he did finally find a way past the keeper, courtesy of Max Kruse, it came almost as a bit too little, too late, as if Özil was saying, "yes, I can do this...when I want to."

Here's a shocking tidbit: did you know that this so-called "best #10 in the world" doesn't even wear the number? Perhaps it's more than bit fitting that the number he wears for Germany—eight—and the number he wears for Arsenal—eleven—average to something somewhat less than ten. We're through the looking-glass here, people. If Özil can't find a way to more-accurately bounce balls off of other people and past the keeper, we'll be left with only one conclusion: we've been sold a bill of goods.

We can talk and talk and talk until we're blue in the face about chances created, key passes, ghosting, movement off the ball, and all sorts of other nonsensical metrics. At the end of the day, it's getting harder and harder to resist the idea that there's a charlatan in our midst, someone who's not quite on the level. Who could it be?

UPDATE; While I'll admit that I'm not the second coming of Jonathan Swift, I thought the satire was a bit more clear than the comments below indicate! I'll have to try harder next time.

18 comments:

  1. Thank god you don't manage the Arsenal!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Remi 'sugar Ant' Avan-NomayoTuesday, 24 January, 2023

    Last time i'm reading your rubbish blog.
    You forget his performance against man-united already/

    ReplyDelete
  3. author: you've labeled this satire: but i'm not sure you are entirely joking. trying to have it both ways??

    ReplyDelete
  4. provided one assist and won the penality in a game that end up 2-1. what more thing one can do to earn man of the match and to be praised a star? moreover, he was the source of almost every assist for the opportunities missed by the German team; you can see the BBC live commentary page for proof. I know he has his good days and bad days, But in this case it seems you are a mere big hater.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Did u meant it or are you just being sarcastic? If u meant it, We are sorry. Author of this article is deaf ,dumb , blind, rival fan, ozil hater, mistook golf as soccer for large part of his life. He thinks a footballer is a super human who plays to his 100 pecent on daily basis. For him form is permanent. He also does his job perfectly 24 x 7 , never makes a mistake and never be dull. Always 100 percent .He is a mutant.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think you're are deluded and wrote this article for the sake of it. You didn't do your homework and therefore, don't know what you are talking about. Ozil was the best player last night, perhaps you were watching something else or you need to go SPECSAVERS

    ReplyDelete
  7. ...is either this author is stoned out of his mind, or just like the Michael Owens of this world, " seeking cheap publicity. Someone should counsel this nut case to stay clear of dissociative drugs-it's not good for the mind. "... is a charlatan in our midst... ". Really, Ozil a charlatan? "What hallucinogen can do to a man's mind".

    ReplyDelete
  8. "someone who's not quite on the level. Who could it be ?
    The author of course !
    I wish they'd stop playing these silly "jokes" on us.

    ReplyDelete
  9. To the author of this junk, Either get with the team or sod off we don't need you.

    ReplyDelete
  10. you do realize he's taking the piss, don't you? John maybe you need to make the humor more obvious. Ppl seemed to all miss the point!

    ReplyDelete
  11. Hey Guys this fellow is praising Ozil not faulting him. he is saying Oxil created more opportunities to score than the rest of the players of both the teams combined together.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Jon

    You cite Tantalus, but you are living a very different Greek myth: The myth of Sisyphus. Whether the original or the existentialist Albert Camus version, either way you push a boulder up the steep hill only to have it roll back just as you nearly reach the top.

    No matter how hard you try to simplify your satire, you fail. Maybe you need to start your blog essay with a spoiler alert or maybe you need to add disclaimers throughout the text. One has to wonder how Swift succeeded unless, of course, he suffered a similar fate.

    ReplyDelete
  13. erm it's called satire. John's expecting a lot of his readers, to be honest. In reality, I think there is something to suggest that many of Ozil's passes are in fact "too good" for most players to finish. He seems to surprise even them with his ability to put the ball in just the right spot.

    ReplyDelete
  14. Not convinced he is , Anyway no one likes a smart arse!

    ReplyDelete
  15. With this spectacular fail Jon it might be better if you didn't try at all.

    ReplyDelete
  16. ouch. noted. maybe I should leave the satire to those who know how to do it.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Daniel Arsenal CowanTuesday, 24 January, 2023

    I've come to know Jon well over the past few years and I can categorically state that he is one of the most positive, supportive fans out there. This is 100% satire.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Daniel Arsenal CowanTuesday, 24 January, 2023

    I'm a huge fan of Jon and cannot think of a more level-headed and positive supporter. This article is satire and possibly that is not Jon's strong point. I don't think it was a poor attempt at satire but I must say that Jon has fallen into the trap all first time satirists do and has written in the belief everyone will get his sense of humour. His close friends and regular readers will totally get this satire but the nuance of his humour is lost in the prose if you don't know him.
    Read the article again with the knowledge that it's a commentary on those who consistently underrate Özil and his genius and you'll appreciate what an amusing post it is.

    Don't give up on the satire, Jon. You'll know to caveat it better next time.

    ReplyDelete

Log in with Google, comment anonymously, or link your social media. If you go anonymous, consider "signing" off with a name/nickname in case others want to reply.

Disqus