04 November 2014

Alexis has earned himself a spot on the bench against Anderlecht.

It may sound at first like heresy, benching our most-prolific, energetic scorer and creator, but hear me out. Yes, he's scored ten goals and notched three assists—five of those goals in his last three appearances—and he's quickly proven himself to be a quicksilver talisman who can turn a match on its head with his attacking elan, but, still, he must be benched. It's for his own good as well as that of the squad itself. We simply can't afford to depend on him to the extent we've come to do thus far, with each appearance increasing his chances of redlining and being ruled out or rendered ineffective. We have too many other attacking options, some of them admittedly a bit rusty, but they should pose more than enough of a threat against the likes of Anderlecht.

More Podolski, please...
Consider Alexis as Mesut Özil revisited. Like Özil, Alexis has gotten off to a brilliant start and has reinvigorated the squad. However, there's a very-real risk that, like Özil, Alexis could fade. It's one thing to perform at this level when England's climate is balmy; it's quite another in December and January when temperatures drop, pitches freeze up, and fixtures accumulate rather than fade away as they do in La Liga. Give Alexis a rest, I say.

What's more, Anderlecht haven't posed much of a threat to this point in Group D, scoring only a pair of goals in three matches, one in their 1-1 draw at Galatasaray and one, admittedly, against us in the first leg. While I'd rather not revisit the tetchy, bum-clenching first 88 minutes of that match, it's worth noticing that the momentum of the match swung in our direcion after the introduction of a few attackers we've otherwise seen little of: Joel Campbell and Lukas Podolski. They've each languished on the bench, leading to anguished if not angry cries for one or both to be played a bit more often, if only to allow them to ply their wares and increase any potential transfer-fees come January.

Podolski has shown time and again his ability to deliver stunning, thunderous shots (if not goals) with that Hammer of Mjölnir he calls his left leg, Twice in the closing minutes against Burnley, he volleyed shots in jaw-dropping (if not decapitating) style, one an amazing ninja-like scissor-step in the 84th minute that sadly was straight at the keeper and t'other a laser-beam that very nearly separated Ramsey's head from his body before perhaps permanently denting the post. It's what he does. It's perhaps all he does, which is why I'd suggest he not start but come in late in the match. Would Arsène agree to make a substitution at around the 70th minute? Worth an ask, I'd say. Podolski doesn't seem able to deliver a full, ninety-minutes, at least not one chock-a-block with effort. He seems to be at his best in 10--to-20 minute bursts, ideally against defenses already run ragged by other, more-industrious types. With all of this in mind, I'd suggest Poldi come on to replace Rosický on the left late in the match.

And that brings us to Joel Campbell, who's much more of an enigma. He's only made a few cameos here and there, the longest one 71 minutes against Southampton in the league cup. Like Alexis, he's a dynamic, lightning-fast attacker who seems to love going directly at a defense. Unlike Alexis, he's apparently not yet earned Arsène's trust. A squad like Anderlecht might give Campbell a chance to do that. His ability to wreak havoc on a defense was on full-display during the World Cup, when he propelled Costa Rica to a stunning group-stage win over the likes of England, Italy, and Uruguay. With the ball at his feet, he's a dervish who drives deep into the defense to create chances for himself and for teammates. If we're to rest Alexis, well, Campbell might be the poor man's imitation. Let him run helter-skelter on the right side and see what he can do to unlock Anderlecht's defense, such as it is. I have a feeling that Campbell is chomping at the proverbial bit to show what he can do, and if it is in fact merely a facsimile of what Alexis has done so far, he could do far worse.

So, if we're agreed that Alexis won't start, and we can't send in Wilshere or Özil, who's to play through the middle? Send in Santi, who's been at his best for us when he's played as CAM. However, his fluffed sitter against Burnley suggests a player bereft of confidence and form. Whereas Alexis needs a break, Cazorla should benefit from a chance to play a more-vital role. With Rosický and Campbell on the wings harassing and hustling, Cazorla should find lots of room to operate. Then, as Anderlecht fade, we bring in the reinforcements: Podolski on the left, Walcott on the right. Each of them needs time on the pitch to refind their form, all the better to divsersify and deepen our attack.

Yes, Alexis has been sexy and scintillating and sensational. However, if we expect that to continue, sadly, we have to relegate him to the bench here and there. If this gives others like Cazorla, Podolski, and Campbell a chance to shine, so much the better.

What do you think? Can we afford to rest Alexis against Anderlecht, or has be proven himself irreplaceable? Share your thoughts in the comments-section below...

7 comments:

  1. i don't think we can afford to rest him, tbh. who else will step up? Alexis has scored against Burnley, Sunderland, and Hull so if he's out, where will the goals come from? Rosicky isn't a scorer and Campbell hasn't shown any of the form that attracted us after the World Cup. We need to win this match to strengthen our hold on second place and keep alive any chance of winning the group!

    ReplyDelete
  2. You forgot that it may come down to goal difference between Dortmund and us as to who heads the group. Alexis will play.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The idea of resting or rotating is sound, if not, necessary. Alexis seems the only player capable of scoring these days. The others stand around, figuratively, if not, literally. Can they learn to do what is needed and summon up the ability to run and not walk, to chase after the ball and not wait for it to arrive, to push forward and not be knocked back, to shoot and not just pass?

    I like the idea of trying Campbell. Podolski deserves a chance as well. Can Santi shoot with power and acuracy? Burnley was the time to make this change and the inability for anyone to step up demonstrates the underlying weakness of the club and lack of a leader.

    If Arsenal were strong, this match would be an opportunity, but we need to get into the next CL round so desperately Arsene will play it safe and continue his practice of wearing down his few and most reliable players. Part of this stems from his fear of losing or not succeding. Part of this is stems from the weakness of the club that he built and a recognition that he lacks a bench that can be relied upon in moments of crisis. Either way, the lineup he fields may reflect how Arsene thinks and how much he wants to prove his way is the best way, if not, the only way, and even if it leads to injuries or defections in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Should be rested but think he will play. Hopefully score 4 goals in the first half then just take him off. that would be luvly jubbly.

    ReplyDelete
  5. fair point but I think Dortmund are +9 going into tonight and we're only +2. There's only three matches to play, so I don't think we can bang in 10 more goals than they will even with Alexis.

    ReplyDelete
  6. can we win the group the way BVB are playing? w're the only ones who look like we can beat them but they have a big goal differnential that we can't match. better to rest Sanchez now even if it confirms that we'll finish 2nd. i don't see Gala or Anderlecht catching us and I'd rather keep Sanchez fresh for Prem matches!

    ReplyDelete
  7. King Wenger has ruled that Campbell isn't even in the squad (new info after this blog, John so don't fret). If he isn't good enough or doesn't fit in, we'll have to dump him. He's behind Theo and Ox on the right, and maybe even Gnabry once he's fit. We have no need for a 4th choice winger.

    ReplyDelete

Log in with Google, comment anonymously, or link your social media. If you go anonymous, consider "signing" off with a name/nickname in case others want to reply.

Disqus